General NewsLatest

WATCH VIDEO: Afia Schwar Mocks John Mahama, NDC For Making Fatal Errors In Their Petition To The Supreme Court

Comedienne, Afia Schwarzenegger has weighed in the mistakes committed by the NDC in their petition to the Supreme Court.


According to Afia Schwar, one of the celebrities who betrayed NDC in the just ended 2020 elections, the NDC’s mistake should not have been made in the first place since they are in the position to claims what they deem have been taken from them.

The controversial Afia Schwar stated that initially she thought it was the doings of Asiedu Nketia, and chairman Ofosu Ampofo (who also is seeking to buy as the flagbearer of the NDC).

Afia Schwar stated that the NDC were around during the counting of votes and still claimed they were cheated and in attempts to take legal actions, they have made mistakes in their petition to the apex court.

Lastly, Afia Schwar sent a message to Lawyer Tamaklo of the NDC and stated that no one will pay heed to him should he tries to explain himself on Okay Fm.

And this will be crowned the beef of all beefs 202……cos my father’s people no dey like the truth at all.
Shall we put our hands together and welcome them at the comments section with their dead goat insults…😄 🤣 😂 😆 😄 🤣 😂 😆 😄 🤣 😂 😆
Happy New Year… 🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ 🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ 🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ 🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ 🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ 🏃‍♂️

Watch the video below:

Mistakes were spotted in viral pictures believed to be the NDC’s petition to the Supreme Court as they challenge the NPP over the 2020 presidential election results which NDC have tagged as flawed and discredited get the internet talking.

In one the numerous screenshots making waves on the internet, the NDC declared both Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo and the Electoral Commission as the first (1st) respondents.

This was a misleading information to the general public and has caught the attention of many netizens since it’s released in the internet.

Also, in relief (F), that is where the fatal error occurred. The petitioner, John Dramani Mahama is requesting the supreme court, to direct the 1st respondent, to organise another election between the petitioner and the 1st respondent

Please send us your articles for publication via


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button